Here is a common model for churches that have both traditional and contemporary services:
8:00 AM - Traditional Service
9:15 AM - Bible Class
10:30 AM - Contemporary Service
There is a common argument that the reason for Contemporary Services is that they are so popular. Here is my challenge. I am calling for one church to flip the schedule for a while and see how the attendance works out. I have never seen this attempted and I would like to see what happens when this is the schedule:
8:00 AM - Contemporary Service
9:15 AM - Bible Class
10:30 AM - Traditional Service
In the majority of churches that I have attended, I have observed that the late service is always bigger even when they have the exact same format. My hypothesis here is that time is an important variable to attendance. I think that time is so important that most people will not get up early to go to the contemporary service. I think that attendance has more to do with personal schedules than worship style. I am willing to bet that the attendance numbers will not flip with the schedule change. I am certain that the demographics will not perfectly flip and that some are at least attending their service out of habit or convenience rather than voting with their feet.
Try it. I'd love to hear your findings. I would be fascinated if you could prove me wrong.
Monday, September 15, 2008
Mike's Dedication Challenge
Posted by Mike Baker at 16:27
Labels: Doctrine and malPractice
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment